Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 6:28:28 GMT -5
Civil Law (IBDCivil) expressed a similar opinion. For him, article 19 goes against the constitutional provision for civil liability and prioritizes patrimonial protection over human protection. According to Quinelato, the State must play a regulatory role to protect people's rights. Marcelo Hobaika, from the National Association of Magazine Editors (Aner), stated that article 19 relativizes the protection of human dignity. According to him, the consumer cannot be placed in a position of inferiority to internet providers. Aislan Basílio, from the Brazilian Radio and Television Association (Abratel) said that infringing content must be removed by algorithms. Those of a subjective nature must undergo analysis and judicial determination, with improvement of the legislation. Finally, Miguel Novaes, from the National Directorate of the Workers' Party (PT), said that the Marco Civil was not enough to prevent fake news on social media during the electoral period.
With information from the STF press office .he police, this act constitutes an exercise of self-defense, in addition to an instinctive reflex to preserve freedom, and not the desire to disobey the legal order. Tocantins Military Police Tocantins Military Police Defendant who fled when approached by police is acquitted of the crime of disobedience Based on this understanding, the 10th Criminal Law Chamber of the São Paulo Court of Justice reformed part of a sentence to acquit a man accused of disobedience for having fled a police app Special Phone Number Data roach. According to the records, the defendant had received and driven, for his own benefit, a vehicle stolen the day before, knowing that it was the proceeds of crime. During the investigation, the police tried to approach the accused, who managed to escape. He was charged with crimes of disobedience and malicious reception. In the first instance, he was sentenced to serve, in an initial closed regime, one year and nine months in prison and, in an initial semi-open regime, two months and 12 days of detention, in addition to paying a fine.
The TJ-SP, in turn, maintained the conviction only for the crime of reception. For the rapporteur, judge Nelson Fonseca Júnior, it was evident, "unequivocally", that the accused actually received and drove the stolen vehicle, being fully aware of its criminal origin, so much so that he fled to avoid the police approach. "No evidence was produced to the effect that the appellant was not the driver of the property, as claimed by him on judicial grounds, a burden that was incumbent upon him, pursuant to the provisions of article 156 of the CPP. It should be noted, in this aspect, that no A family member or acquaintance of the defendant appeared at the police station, or even on court grounds, in order to corroborate his version." On the other hand, the rapporteur understood that the crime of disobedience was not established.
With information from the STF press office .he police, this act constitutes an exercise of self-defense, in addition to an instinctive reflex to preserve freedom, and not the desire to disobey the legal order. Tocantins Military Police Tocantins Military Police Defendant who fled when approached by police is acquitted of the crime of disobedience Based on this understanding, the 10th Criminal Law Chamber of the São Paulo Court of Justice reformed part of a sentence to acquit a man accused of disobedience for having fled a police app Special Phone Number Data roach. According to the records, the defendant had received and driven, for his own benefit, a vehicle stolen the day before, knowing that it was the proceeds of crime. During the investigation, the police tried to approach the accused, who managed to escape. He was charged with crimes of disobedience and malicious reception. In the first instance, he was sentenced to serve, in an initial closed regime, one year and nine months in prison and, in an initial semi-open regime, two months and 12 days of detention, in addition to paying a fine.
The TJ-SP, in turn, maintained the conviction only for the crime of reception. For the rapporteur, judge Nelson Fonseca Júnior, it was evident, "unequivocally", that the accused actually received and drove the stolen vehicle, being fully aware of its criminal origin, so much so that he fled to avoid the police approach. "No evidence was produced to the effect that the appellant was not the driver of the property, as claimed by him on judicial grounds, a burden that was incumbent upon him, pursuant to the provisions of article 156 of the CPP. It should be noted, in this aspect, that no A family member or acquaintance of the defendant appeared at the police station, or even on court grounds, in order to corroborate his version." On the other hand, the rapporteur understood that the crime of disobedience was not established.
)) 