Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 1:08:14 GMT -5
Ángel J. Cabezos is a forensic psychologist. Criminologist focused on concreteness, trained in psychopathology, advocacy, criminology and problem solving. From the result of his interests, two jobs are bifurcated: analyzing criminal cases defending the conclusions in Court and intervening in family conflicts with minors when the seriousness of the events exceeds that of other professionals.
They both speak the same language. His deductive thinking and logical-formal rhetoric translate into an intense work day. A defense strategy must be offered against continued, repeated, insistent judicial actions against a person or entity (or defined group) by another.
David Fechenbach points out that the simplest case to DJ USA analyze and the best defense strategy is the one in which a subject decides to complain, insistently, against an entity (a company, a service, an “entity”). In this type of actions, the subject urges the action of justice through different mechanisms : he can begin with the informal complaint to those responsible for the service, formalize the complaint in the forms designed for this and process it diligently.
In the absence of a response or the (subjective) inadmissibility of the arguments that do not satisfy his wishes, he may raise the claim to the Consumer Arbitration Boards, or to the Courts (Litigious-Administrative, Civil, Social). Dismissal will mean going to the last instance through appeal. Motivation usually takes on a very personal tone – says Angel J. Cabezos. Not only is it a right that, it is maintained, has been violated, but the attack is “personal”, and what comes into play is beyond law, honor, due consideration, Davidian-Goliatense sentiment.
It becomes entrenched, it translates into a mental block, a recurring thought, a deep discomfort. A dull emotional pain. Since there is “no one” behind it (although the resolutions that this person obtains are signed by name and surname) the feeling of impunity increases the need for justice . "You can't treat me like that and I'm going to show you."
They both speak the same language. His deductive thinking and logical-formal rhetoric translate into an intense work day. A defense strategy must be offered against continued, repeated, insistent judicial actions against a person or entity (or defined group) by another.
David Fechenbach points out that the simplest case to DJ USA analyze and the best defense strategy is the one in which a subject decides to complain, insistently, against an entity (a company, a service, an “entity”). In this type of actions, the subject urges the action of justice through different mechanisms : he can begin with the informal complaint to those responsible for the service, formalize the complaint in the forms designed for this and process it diligently.
In the absence of a response or the (subjective) inadmissibility of the arguments that do not satisfy his wishes, he may raise the claim to the Consumer Arbitration Boards, or to the Courts (Litigious-Administrative, Civil, Social). Dismissal will mean going to the last instance through appeal. Motivation usually takes on a very personal tone – says Angel J. Cabezos. Not only is it a right that, it is maintained, has been violated, but the attack is “personal”, and what comes into play is beyond law, honor, due consideration, Davidian-Goliatense sentiment.
It becomes entrenched, it translates into a mental block, a recurring thought, a deep discomfort. A dull emotional pain. Since there is “no one” behind it (although the resolutions that this person obtains are signed by name and surname) the feeling of impunity increases the need for justice . "You can't treat me like that and I'm going to show you."
)) 